Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/K1/Proposed decision

Case closed with no ruling

Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or vote to abstain.

• Only items that receive a majority yay vote will be enacted.
• Items that receive a majority nay vote will be formally rejected.
• Items that do not receive a majority yay or nay vote will be open to possible amendment by any arbitrator if he so chooses. After the amendment process is complete, the item will be voted on one last time.
• Items that receive a majority abstentions will need to go through an amendment process and be re-voted on once.

Conditional votes for, against, or to abstain should be explained by the Arbitrator in parenthesis after his time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were enacted.

Proposed temporary orders

1) {text of proposed orders}

Ayes:

Nayes:

Abstentions:

Proposed principles

1) Personal attacks are not permitted on Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:No personal attacks

Ayes:

1. Fred Bauder 12:43, Aug 8, 2004 (UTC)
2. James F. (talk) 03:58, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
3. Jwrosenzweig 22:03, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Nays:

Abstentions:

Proposed findings of fact

1) User K1 has engaged in a series of personal attacks, see, for example, [1], [2] and [3]

Ayes:

1. Fred Bauder 12:42, Aug 8, 2004 (UTC)
2. The Cunctator 19:10, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC)
3. James F. (talk) 03:58, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
4. Jwrosenzweig 22:07, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC) (I want to note that this abusiveness rises well above the bar I normally set -- some personal attacks are played fairly close to the line, but the evidence I'm seeing is appallingly excessive.)

Nayes:

Abstentions:

Proposed remedies

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Ayes:

Nayes:

Abstentions:

Enforcement

proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Ayes:

Nayes:

Abstentions: