User talk:Almafeta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: List of Wikipedias by sample of articles[edit]

I update it once a month. --MarsRover (talk) 20:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

very useful the expanded ranking, thanks --88.5.194.180 (talk) 14:40, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Almafeta. If you keep the code, could you please update the meta:User:Almafeta/List of Wikipedias by extended list of articles? I know it's just for curiosity, but it's been a long time since the last update and in the catalan wikipedia we would like to know where we would be now. Thank you! --Meldor (talk) 08:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back! :)[edit]

Hello, Shanya! We've never talked to each other before, so you do not know me, but I am glad you are back to Wikipedia.

I used to read your posts to alt.languages.interlingua and I have seen many contributions of yours to the propagation of Interlingua scattered throughout the Internet (for instance, the translation of the GURPS rules, and a lot of effort in earlier versions of the Interlingua article). I would have entered in contact with you before to talk about our shared hobby, but unfortunately I do not know how to post to alt.languages.interlingua (my Gmail account allows me only to read the posts, and I do not know why).

It is unfortunate for me that you do not participate in the INTERLNG list from the Union Mundial pro Interlingua. If I had seen a message of yours there before, I would have sent you a private message through e-mail. It is also a pity that you are not integrated with the community of that discussion list (which is the main e-mail list for Interlingua in the world), because I feel you get much fewer praises than you deserve, since you are probably unknown by most there. For instance, years ago I sent a message to INTERLNG praising your efforts, but no one joined me in praising you, probably because the other people there do not know how relevant Shanya is to the Interlingua movement.

I am very glad to make contact with you.

Kind regards. --Antonielly (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Interlingua[edit]

si, salvo io ocupate con schola, talmente io non poter mucho esser hic...regretar :/ Scigirl543 (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Poke-expand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 12:58, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Usator[edit]

I guess it's okay, but i don't know why do they think i was "deleted", lol, it's already created. Greetings.--Jcaraballo 00:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail![edit]

Hello, Almafeta. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]

WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Almafeta! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Come to the First Topeka Meetup, January 15![edit]

Come celebrate Wikipedia Day with other Kansas Wikipedians sponsored by Wikimedians Active in Local Regions in the United States (WALRUS) and hosted by the Topeka and Shawnee Public Library. Come chat, hang out and enjoy good company while find out more about Wikipedia in our regional community! RSVP at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Wikipedia_Day.

If you can't come, but still want to find out about events in the greater Topeka region (which may include KC, Manhattan, Lawrence, Salina, or other places where volunteers are interested) sign up for future notifications at Wikipedia:Meetup/Topeka/Invite list.

Hope to see you there Sadads (talk) 20:24, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming event at the WWI Museum in Kansas City[edit]

Hello! I would like to invite you to a Wikipedia editathon about WWI and Dissent on November 22 at the National World War I Museum in Kansas City. Join us for the U.S. branch of this international event as we write more social history from the era around WWI into Wikipedia! All editors are welcome, contributors to topics around WWI other than Dissent also encouraged! Food and drinks will be supplied by the WWI museum, Sadads (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Almafeta. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Heteropatriarchy[edit]

Hi! They are trying to delete again the article about heteropatriarchy. Could you help to improve the article or to take part in the discussion? Thanks a lot! DaddyCell (talk) 13:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Flying Mice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references of any kind.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chetsford (talk) 09:49, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Almafeta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Almafeta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flying Mice for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying Mice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying Mice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Color argument has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has had no sources since creation. WP:BEFORE shows no results relevant to content

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seoltoir22 (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Societate American pro Interlingua for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Societate American pro Interlingua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Societate American pro Interlingua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –MJLTalk 07:03, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Wikipedia:Next has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 14 § Wikipedia:Next until a consensus is reached. Q𝟤𝟪 15:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]