Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glasgow Kelvinhall

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:53, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Glasgow Kelvinhall[edit]

PatGallacher tagged this article vfd, but got confused by the convoluted VfD process (quite understandably IMO). No vote from me. —Korath (Talk) 15:40, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)

From the talk page:

Delete
There is no way this stub can be turned into an encyclopedic entry. The underground station in question is just a single island platform up an alley. It wrongly states that it is the best station for Glasgow University, this is actually Hillhead. Its only claim to notability is that it is the station for the Kelvin Hall, but that doesn't even make it the most notable station on the Glasgow Underground, this point could be put in the main article. If this is notablity we will end up with entries for most of the underground stations in central London and other cities.
PatGallacher 21:00, 2005 Jan 30 (UTC)(talk)
  • Keep, based on the inclusion of the London Underground articles (which I agree with) the stations of the Glasgow equivalent are no less encyclopedic. Thryduulf 16:08, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep The argument about railway station articles should be considered closed. Philip 18:32, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, it's helpful (and entirely aside from that, more encyclopedic than most of the gamercruft that gets kept around here). Wyss 21:17, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. All railway stations are notable. --Centauri 23:14, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Can this really be expanded? --Neigel von Teighen 23:17, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • keep regardless. Yuckfoo 01:25, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep for reasons given by Thryduulf. --Idont Havaname 04:46, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and be careful with those scissors. GRider\talk 17:11, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non notable. Gamaliel 22:01, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Improve it if you feel it's inaccurate max rspct 23:04, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Glasgow_Kelvinhall&oldid=49807498"