User talk:Ae-a

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- Utcursch | Talk to me

Edit war on Surrealism[edit]

Greetings and welcome, I am sorry you are caught in the middle of an edit war on Surrealism, please don't take it personally. Stirling Newberry 03:15, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Edit reattribution[edit]

Hi; just a comment about your request for change of attribution of edits; you must currently open up separate accounts on the different language wikis. If you do that with the same email address in each, and probably same password, then, according to what I have read elsewehere, in a future software update they should all become one account for all wikis. I think it'll be easier for the developer if you first open up accounts on each wiki. Mozzerati 17:04, 2005 Feb 15 (UTC)

Chatsubo poste on Knot (disambiguation)[edit]

The page en:knot should link to ja:ロープワーク. NOT the ja:結び目. My guess would be the Japanese preference for ja:ノット and ja:結び目 remaining separate because of keyboard entry issues. But you are right about ja:ノット to en:knot_(disambiguation).:

The page ja:結び目 is more for a catch for the technical concept of knot or someone who used a machine translator. No one would use those characters for necktie for example. It woudn't be so bad realy, except for that third Kanji:

I just started Wiki And I'd have to spend more time to figure out their style on Wiki. I would presume that ja:ノット would ultimately have be their disambiguous page, to their chagrin, due to Wiki-style on Inter-wiki links. If interlingua is the desired goal without a smart-hyper-text search.:

I've noticed that to be the biggest thorn in my side trying to go between languages and the present Inter-wiki style to Japanese. There are Three japanese character sets to write the same word in English, Four because a term can use all three at the same time, BUT you are allowed basically One link.:

It would be nice to do your suggestion in an ideal world, but that would mean a lot of coffee on their part.:

Personally, I was having it hard enough just doing the knot articles this week for german/japanese to english, there's a million variants and no 3 texas bowlines alike. If your question doesn't get answered by them give me a chat, I'll give a little more umph. I sort of need to use this as my litmus test. Schlüggell | Talk 05:32, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

About the article Compaq portable[edit]

I finally updated this. Read the reply on my own user_talk for full details. - Tonsofpcs 03:56, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks Ae-a 11:30, 2 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thought you might be interested, finally got pictures of the hacked-up Portable III online [1] --tonsofpcs (Talk) 04:50, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on the BASICs![edit]

Hi there, I just wanted to give you my kudos on the work you have done on the BASIC dialects. I take a particular interest in that stuff myself, and so I find it encouraging that there are several of us putting in an effort to categorize and describe the BASICs and their evolution. Later, we should perhaps establish a separate WikiProject for this work. Until then, keep up the good work! --Wernher 00:13, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Intresting Ayyavazhi Family[edit]

Hai Ae, there are intresting articles about Ayyavazhi, a new religion on both mythology and religiosity. Wikipedia is rich with this topic in English, but poor in other languages. Since french is a leading language in Wikipedia it is better to translate the contents on this AYYAVAZHI family to french. - Paul Raj

Double redirects[edit]

Hi, thanks for your comments on RussBot's double-redirect fixing. I will suspend this activity until I can resolve your concerns about the redirect templates. However, I'm not sure I understand exactly what needs to be done.

I noticed that whenever RussBot comes accross a double-redirect where the first redirect in the chain has a redirect template, the template is not changed appropriately whenever the redirect chain is collapsed. An example would be if the first redirect in the chain was {{R from title without diacritics}} and the next one was {{R from alternate language}}. What should happen in this case is that when the chain is collapsed, the first redirect should be changed from {{R from title without diacritics}} to {{R from alternate language}}. If it is too much work to try and come up with a list of all possible changes for the redirect-template when collapsing redirect-chains, then RussBot should just erase the redirect-template.

OK, I see how that works with alternate language, but are you sure it is appropriate for all redirect-templates? Maybe it would just be better to review these manually.

Also, would it be possible for RussBot to skip redirects with the type {{R with possibilities}}? Otherwise, when the page in question becomes an article, the links that were supposed to link to that article would end up linking to what the article redirected to when it was a redirect.

This one I'm not so sure about. What you have now is something like [[Foo]] that reads:

  • #REDIRECT [[Bar]] {{R with possibilities}}

and then [[Bar]] reads:

  • #REDIRECT [[Baz]] {{R from misspelling}}

What I think I should do is fix the misspelling on [[Foo]] but leave the template there, so it would read:

  • #REDIRECT [[Baz]] {{R with possibilities}}

This doesn't change any existing articles that link to [[Foo]], so if [[Foo]] ever gets made into an article of its own the links to it will still be valid. Is that consistent with what you had in mind? --Russ Blau (talk) 15:06, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

At last, I have responded on your talk-page. Sorry baout the late response. Ae-a 19:53, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the screenshots[edit]

Thanks for taking the time for providing the screen shots for Atari BASIC. Really, if more people took the time that you have, the wiki would be widely illustrated. If you ever have the yen to take more screenshots, let me know, I have LOTS of suggestions for Atari-related articles I'm too lazy to illustrate myself. And happy new year! Maury 03:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:CompaqPortable.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CompaqPortable.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Fair use and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Konstable 04:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:CompaqPortableCase.jpg[edit]

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CompaqPortableCase.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Fair use and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. KonstableSock 08:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TippexWithFoamApplicator.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 21:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:ToshibaLibretto1100.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ToshibaLibretto1100.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:ToshibaLibretto70ct.jpg[edit]

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:ToshibaLibretto70ct.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 23:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:TippexCapHolding.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:TippexCapHolding.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ChrisiPK (talk) 22:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note, you've been added to the list because of inactivity since July 2008. Feel free to remove your username from the list when you've returned. :) -- OlEnglish (Talk) 04:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AtariBasicStartup.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AtariBasicStartup.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:09, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AtariSelftest.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AtariSelftest.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sesame's Treet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Drug use, Oops, Kosmos, Get Down and Raver

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:TippexOldStyleBottle.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TippexOldStyleBottle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sproing Interactive Media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North & South (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MeGUI. Since you had some involvement with the MeGUI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Codename Lisa (talk) 03:13, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect templates listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Redirect templates. Since you had some involvement with the Redirect templates redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Institutes has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Institutes, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Nadan) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Nadan, Ae-a!

Wikipedia editor Herostratus just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating the article "Nadan". I just reviewed it. It passed review and seems fine.

To reply, leave a comment on Herostratus's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Viruskiller listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Viruskiller. Since you had some involvement with the Viruskiller redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black & Lane's Ident Tones for Surround for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black & Lane's Ident Tones for Surround is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black & Lane's Ident Tones for Surround until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 02:38, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ae-a. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British School of Amsterdam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gymnasium and Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tom Koch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absurdist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ae-a. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Ae-a. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Life as We don't Know It" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Life as We don't Know It. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 19#Life as We don't Know It until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:29, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghost train (folklore) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghost train (folklore) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost train (folklore) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 20:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charlière, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot air. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]