Talk:C-One

Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This comes across rather like an advertisement for the C-One and Individual Computers, doesn't it? Rayray 15:29, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps it comes across as an advertisement because it's the only machine of its type. It's aimed at the "retro-hacker" community and specifically those fond of Commodore machines. It's seen as a modern-day continuation of those old vintage platforms.

Will anyone be brave enough to include the less-than-shining history of the C-1? the fiascoes like Jeri never actually having a working C64 core, the chilling effect the vapourware product had on other FPGA Commodore projects, the blatant sexism used by people promoting the project online, the 'secret' 64DTV project's effect on development progress, the Jeri and Jens stoush.. 203.14.156.192 (talk) 17:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was into this stuff until a few years ago; the only vaguely similar product out there is perhaps the |http://www.xgamestation.com XGameStation| board, but it's more aimed at people new to low-level programming and hardware development, not really covering retro computing directly at all. --59.167.99.43 04:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this non-notable cack, you abysmal cunts. 90.211.193.175 (talk) 22:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated content?[edit]

There are several 'reconfigurable' FPGA-based platforms out there now, including a plug-in card for the Apple ][, the CarteBlance_fpga card.

The onechipmsx is apparently not available in the United States. I added a reconfigurable computing subcategory under computing to allow articles about FPGA-based platforms (and others) to be group together. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikip rhyre (talk • contribs) 20:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Amiga clone[edit]

I can not find any sources to backup this claim. C-One home page says nothing about it. Xorxos (talk) 17:54, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on C-One. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on C-One. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110118064507/http://www.particles.org/forums/ to http://www.particles.org/forums/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]