Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinosis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:57, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Kinosis

This is a missspelling of Kenosis on which there is already an article -- I've merged everything that's new into Kenosis so delete this Doc Glasgow 15:29, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to kenosis for two reasons. Firstly, it's a probable mispelling, and therefore a useful redirect, and our policy has been to keep these and even give them the benefit of the doubt. Secondly, cut-and-paste merges (I haven't checked whether you have done one, but the principle is important enough to mention anyway) violate the GFDL unless the history is somehow preserved. Andrewa 16:27, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Sorry didn't think about copyright - but I did greatly amend the info - redirect sounds sensible

• Delete, duplication. Megan1967 04:25, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as a plausible typo and as the simplest way to preserve history info. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 04:28, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. Rossami (talk) 04:36, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.