Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ourika

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep Sjakkalle 08:17, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ourika[edit]

CSD: no content. I'm listing it here to give User:Ponyboy a chance to expand it. —msh210 21:02, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Del —msh210 21:02, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this is a very notable book. --iMb~Meow 21:52, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP sorry, i saved it too soon before i had added the rest of the info. it's complete now, as well as an additional link to a Claire de Duras page.--Ponyboy 22:00, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Nice article now about a notable novel. VFDing an article 1 minute after its creation seems a bit too harsh for me, even if it was blank. You could have told him at his user page... Sarg 22:03, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Stancel 00:52, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Msh210, you listed the article one minute after it was created. I appreciate your vigilant observation of the new pages folder, but I encourage you to show patience before tagging articles for deletion. I don't really feel like saying that youre giving Ponyboy a chance to expand it is fair, it's more like youre trying to push him into expanding it, which he was already doing. I understand that it's hard to know based on a first look at a new article whether or not the editor will return, or intends to expand it, and oftentimes they do not. I guess it's just something to think about. EvilPhoenix 05:05, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.