Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen stewart

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:45, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen stewart[edit]

Vanity page. Deltabeignet 22:23, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional, vanity. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 09:23, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Geogre's rule of lower case surnames holds - delete Grutness...wha? 10:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 10:53, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Grutness is right - a lowercase surname in the article title is an almost certain sign of vanity. — JIP | Talk 12:31, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Geogre's law failure, promo for a geocities site. The person is not yet notable. Geogre 15:06, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I also have a similar rule that if a business can only afford to put their web site on a free web hosting service like Geocities, it cannot be noteworthy. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 15:44, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.