Welcome![edit]

Before you start writing anything, be sure that you create a subsection for what you are writing, e.g. "== Topic Here ==", and sign your comment with four tilde's, "~". Thanks! Silivrenion (talk) 22:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cotton Mills Article[edit]

Do you feel up to doing a Cottons mills in New England article, I hope eventually to do a series:Cottons mills in Lancashire, Cottons mills in Derbyshire. In these the focus will be slightly different- and while I can cut and paste some text from Cotton Mill I can deal with individual specific mills. But for the moment, I have a busy nonwiki weekend ahead of me. --ClemRutter (talk) 09:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for vandal revert on my page[edit]

Have a cookie. :D Millahnna (mouse)talk 19:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your application to use VandalSniper[edit]

Thank you for applying to use the counter-vandalism tool VandalSniper. I am pleased to inform you that you are now approved to use the tool. To download the program, see here; please also read the features guide if you have not already done so. VandalSniper is a powerful program, so remember that misuse may result in your access being withdrawn and that disruptive editing through the program may see your account blocked by an administrator. If you have any questions, please contact a developer. Regards, AGK [•] 12:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your assistance please[edit]

This edit of yours, without an edit summary, seems to have lost the previous edit history. I recognize text I wrote, in the current article -- but I am not listed in the article's contribution history.

The GFDL and CC liscenses we release our intellectual property under, when we contribute new content to the project, while generous, do require that our contributions remain attributed to us.

Some experienced administrators know how to graft together contribution histories from multiple articles if content was moved by cut and paste, rather than through the use of the "move" button.

It would be helpful if you said where you cut this text from. Geo Swan (talk) 19:13, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You left this message for me.

OK, I took a closer look at your contribution history. Please never make edits like this pair again. [1] [2]. I checked your last 500 edits in article space, and I don't see you making that kind of edit within that group. Preserving who contributed intellectual material is not a courtesy -- it is a legal requirement of the {{gfdl}} and {{cc}} licenses we use.

I'll ask for an administrator to try and repair the history.

[3] Done Geo Swan (talk) 16:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure your edits were well intentioned Geo Swan (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Poisoned Apple for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poisoned Apple is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poisoned Apple until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:51, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PortableTor listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PortableTor. Since you had some involvement with the PortableTor redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 14:15, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:MassDOT-Highway-Assistance-Van-MAPFRE.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:MassDOT-Highway-Assistance-Van-MAPFRE.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 09:31, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity[edit]

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Silivrenion. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Silivrenion. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beecher's Bible for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beecher's Bible is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beecher's Bible until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:19, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]