Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory sustentation matter

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Jinian 13:52, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Theory sustentation matter

Appears to be a non-notable crackpot theory. Unsure if should go under Category:Pseudoscience or be deleted. - RoyBoy ⁸⁰⁰ 06:36, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Nonsense kook theory. Not funny, so no BJAODN. jni 08:10, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete it. Phobophile 10:27, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and rename to Theory of the sustentation of matter. Notable "crackpot" theory. Not original research. Lots of Google hits. Stub needs expansion to include critical views, but is not POV. BTW Category:Pseudoscience itself should be eliminated as it is inherently POV. "Pseudoscience" is a needlessly derogatory label. --Smithfarm
• To be deleted as nonsense. Calling it pseudoscience would be flattery. Gazpacho 02:25, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.