Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tapenade

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 03:33, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

Tapenade[edit]

Not a notable entry.

Keep. Did you look at Category:Food and drink stubs? There are hundreds of articles with much less potential than this one. There's potential history here, and descriptions of variants, and so on. —Wahoofive (talk) 23:48, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. -- Jonel 00:27, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if it can be expanded as Wahoofive suggests. Capitalistroadster
Keep and expand this stub. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:40, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a cookbook entry, so Move to Wikibooks Cookbook. Vegaswikian 06:08, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Reads like poor dict-def. Needs context and needs expansion. As is, delete as trivial. --Simon Cursitor 07:29, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki. R adiant _* 08:25, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and Expand it's notable enough, just needs expansion--Sophitus 15:07, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Keep per Wahoofive. — RJH 17:03, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, real food. Kappa 23:51, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I love tapenade served on hot buttered toast Klonimus 04:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.