Talk:Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeAntonie van Leeuwenhoek was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 18, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 17, 2017, October 9, 2019, and October 9, 2023.

Scientists[edit]

Antonie van leeuwenhoek 41.216.202.85 (talk) 15:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leeuwenhoek[edit]

Please tell me pronounciation 106.216.161.49 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong word—[edit]

In the following sentence: "Van Leeuwenhoek has been attributed as the first person to use a histological stain to color specimens observed under the microscope using saffron."

The word "attributed" is improperly used. "Acknowledged" would be more appropriate here. —Or perhaps the wording could be changed to: "The first use of a histological stain (he used saffron) to color specimens under the microscope has been attributed to van Leeuwenhoek." 2001:5B0:270F:3228:3147:99FB:E9E0:82FA (talk) 16:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

B..... 117.236.131.39 (talk) 14:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chaotic letters[edit]

it would be more respectful to say "long" letters Eugenio.orsi (talk) 21:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistent use of capital letters for "van"[edit]

Should it be "van Leeuwenhoek" or "Van Leeuwenhoek"? I think it should consistently be spelled "van Leeuwenhoek", but the article is inconsistent. Bueller 007 (talk) 22:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]