User talk:Mark272

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Mark272! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,096 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Martin Chivers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mirandinha - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mohammad Al-Anbar - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Terry Gibson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emma Holland for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emma Holland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Holland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of football referees[edit]

The article List of football referees has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poorly sourced, incomplete list with no clear inclusion criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of football referees for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of football referees is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of football referees until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Midfield maestro for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midfield maestro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Midfield maestro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Giant Snowman 21:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Equaliser (sports)[edit]

The article Equaliser (sports) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a dictionary definition and I don't see how it could expand to an article. It has been on WP for 15+ years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Macrakis (talk) 01:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15 § 50 redirects from fictional characters[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 15 § 50 redirects from fictional characters. Qwerfjkl talk 08:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Emma Holland[edit]

Hello, Mark272. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emma Holland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Final Fallacy" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Final Fallacy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 1 § Final Fallacy until a consensus is reached. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:35, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"The Legend of the Philosopher's Stone" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect The Legend of the Philosopher's Stone has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 1 § The Legend of the Philosopher's Stone until a consensus is reached. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:24, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Emma Holland[edit]

Hello, Mark272. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emma Holland".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]