Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perdo Rodigez

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 23:19, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Perdo Rodigez

No such character. No hits on Google. No other article links to this one. Delete.-gadfium 02:54, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Note that the anon author of this also created Jacob van Artevelde, who did exist. Perhaps someone should check the facts there.-gadfium 03:01, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, not notable - only wiki and mirrors with Google returned. Possible hoax. Megan1967 04:10, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Leaning Delete. Tried a variety of spelling variations and still couldn't find any thing. While the anon's Jacob van Artevelde contrib is accurate in the broad details, the detailed timeline seems to vary from the one at the Columbia Encyclopedia. Also, the anons used different spellings of Ghent, so may not be the same person. Niteowlneils 05:48, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• We were two people trying out Wikipedia's resilience to attacks. I am now trying to undo the damage we have done, which involves the Perdo Rodigez article and some changes to the Jacob van Artevelde story which I have already undone. I apologise for the abuse. About the changes in time, the en.wikipedia.org dates were in fact incorrect at the time when we made the abuse. See also nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_van_Artevelde
• Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point. Radiant! 10:42, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.