Talk:Gottschalk of Orbais

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spelling[edit]

There are different spellings of his name like Gottescalc, Godescalc or Godescalchus, I have no idea if there is some need to add them here. And there is some confusion with the place of birth. Here is listed Mainz but other sources give Bern. And of course the date. I have seen 803, 804 etc. And his death is also a bit uncertain I think years like 868/869 would be a bit more accurate.

  • Above commentator, please sign your comments! --Treekids (talk) 02:01, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fulgentius[edit]

According to the The International cyclopedia: a compendium of human knowledge, Volume 6 By Richard Gleason Greene, p. 810 (I found an excerpt in Google Books) Gottschalk of Orbais was also known as Fulgentius. I don't know if this is an *encyclopedic* fact. --Treekids (talk) 02:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Suggested name change[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 10:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Gottschalk (theologian)Gottschalk of Orbais — When distinguished from other Gottschalks (or slightly less known variants like Godescalc), Gottschalk of Orbais appears to be the most common name attested in the literature. Cavila (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Either name is acceptable, but you're right, this is the standard way of identifying this particular Gottschalk. It's an esoteric subject, so using this scholarly name is appropriate as there's little other discussion of him. Andrewa (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.