Talk:Policy debate

Policy debate was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 30, 2005	Peer review	Reviewed
December 14, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Debating B‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Debating, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DebatingWikipedia:WikiProject DebatingTemplate:WikiProject DebatingDebating articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives: 1

Grammar Changes?[edit]

I changed the phrase "The high school resolution will be" to "The high school resolution is" - the debate season is happening now. I don't like being accused of being non-constructive when I make such a minor change - and when it improves the article.

Merger proposals[edit]

Merge Negative (policy debate) and Affirmative (policy debate) stub articles here. They are dead-end stubs, and it's silly to have them over there when they better serve the reader over here, in this article. Discussion here. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 18:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support the proposed redirects per nom. Since it's been five months since you first proposed the move and nobody has objected, User:GenQuest, so you can be bold and consider it a non-controversial change. Andrew³²⁷ 18:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merged boldly Kharkiv07 (T) 17:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spreading[edit]

The article claims, without a source, that "spreading" is a contraction of "speed reading". To my knowledge that is false. For one thing, while speaking very fast can have as its purpose the introduction of a lot of evidence or the presentation of a complex argument on a single point, "spreading" refers specifically to the presentation of a large number of arguments, not necessarily good ones, in the hope that the opposing team will fail to respond to one or more of them. The reference is to "spreading the opposition too thin". I know this from my own time as a debater but surely this must be discussed in a written source somewhere.Bill (talk) 03:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Billposer and Bill: Agreed, that the etymology of "spreading" needs to be clarified and sourced. Additionally I would like to see a section on the history of spreading since it was not always part of the Policy Debate format. When did it start (and by this I mean when did it first come into competition as a strategy and also when was the slang term first recognized? I asked the debate professor at my college and he said as far as he knew (by anecdote) this was all started by a high-school student who deduced (A) that there were no rules on speaking speed and further deduced that (B) if he only spoke a little faster than was normal he would overwhelm his opponent in quantity of arguments. In short, he broke no rules but he "gamed" the system. Other students copied his strategy and the whole damn thing snowballed, with students speaking faster and faster just to keep up. An arms race of speed if you will.

Along the way some of the core elements of good speaking (eye contact, facial expressions, tone, etc) were sacrificed and audiences dwindled (Mom and Dad stopped coming to hear Johnny speak since none of it made sense to their ears). Very sad. 172.88.134.126 (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Policy debate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:06, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Policy debate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Policy and Biometrics[edit]

J have been agonising over a way to ensure a Policy for every website that needs a Policy and I cannot find a truthful way to ensure a Privacy Policy that works with Biometrics, its just not possible. Not at all. Wikinicole23 (talk) 18:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]