Talk:Anthology 3

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles High‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

This article was nominated for merging with A Beginning on March 15, 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/it-s-an-almost-classic-finalact-debacle-given-some-coherence-by-the-white-album-outtakes-1360009.html

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Something (Beatles song)#Harrison's solo demo|Something]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Sessions[edit]

The Let it Be sessions were earlier than the Abbey Road sessions, Abbey Road was released before the production on Let it Be was complete. I've changed the wording to reflect this.Ozzykhan 19:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disc 2 Track Notations[edit]

Where are all the track notations (Mono, Take 1, etc.) on disc two? Can someone who knows them add them? I would, but I am several hundred miles from my copies of the CD's

I was under the impression that I had added the track notations. I'm on it. IAmAgentMunky 01:53, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of the discussion was keep.

The article for the song A Beginning gives no indication of why it is notable. I see no reason there should be a seperate article for it. Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose — It's certainly less notable than most other Beatle-related music, but it's part of an Oscar-winning soundtrack and included on a popular CD. — John Cardinal (talk) 14:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which Oscar-winning soundtrack is it part of? Duffbeerforme (talk) 06:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I got that wrong. it's part of the soundtrack of an Oscar-winning movie. — John Cardinal (talk) 11:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got it wrong twice. <sigh> The soundtrack was nominated for an Oscar, but didn't win. — John Cardinal (talk) 12:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, found it, it was nominated for a Grammy.

I don't see how being included on a soundtrack and an album makes an individual song notable. Even with a Grammy nomination for the soundtrack. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: Enough secondary literature available, therefore enough potential to get it to C or B status. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 06:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where is this secondary literature, did you know of this secondary literature before you suggested that this article should be deleted. Why haven't you improved the article instead of suggesting it's deletion? Still trying to make a point? Duffbeerforme (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Very funny indeed. You may repeat it as often as you wish, but still I never suggested anything for deletion. I just don't know where you get this from. It may be your wish, your fetish or whatever, but that can't be my problem... BTT: For secondary literature I made a brief look at books.google.com and the results were overwhelming. There's enough 3rd party coverage to even write an A class article. And this does not include dozens of magazine articles and interviews. --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 17:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose : Enough with the minimalism already. WP is becoming more of a source for things we already know rather than new info. --Kaizer13 (talk) 16:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anthology 3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/thebeatles/albums/album/230766/review/18878021/the_beatles_anthology_3
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107224423/http://infodisc.fr/Album_B.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_B.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:42, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which date is it?[edit]

One says October 28th the other says October 29th, which one is it? Thanks. AdamTheMusicFan (talk) 12:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]