Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantheognosticism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:13, May 29, 2005 (UTC)

Pantheognosticism[edit]

Neologism, no Google hits. Delete.-gadfium 01:19, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Old wine in new skins. Apparently, it's easier to coin a term than read a history of philosophy. Private word for a very old bit of philosophy. Geogre 03:18, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is even not a neologism. Mikkalai 03:20, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, 0 Google hits. Revolución 04:02, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. Megan1967 06:35, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Jjeffs 13:07, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and confine to Hell/Hades/Shoel/Jahannum/the underworld of your choice (or all of the above)--Doc (t) 15:38, 23 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original research. --metta, The Sunborn 03:39, 24 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.