Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Book of Lies

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page.

This page is an archive of the discussion surrounding the proposed deletion of the page entitled The Book of Lies.

This page is kept as an historic record.

The result of the debate was to keep the article.

Vote to nix page. Let someone come along and actually provide some real content in place of the two one-liners and an advertisement. Compare with The_Holy_Books_of_Thelema, which is a WONDERFUL article about a book by Aleister Crowley.Yeago 23:56, 31 May 2004 (UTC)

Now It's seven one-and-a-half liners, and no ad. (I hates Wikispam, I hates it, I does!) Probably should still be deleted. Dpbsmith 00:44, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Looks like just a poorly constructed disambiguation page to me. Leaning toward keep. blankfaze | •• 00:54, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Agree with above, also, the book of lies is well known - a classic. If there's an article for britney spears there should definitely be an article on something more intellectual such as the book of lies. Leaning towards keep, but reluctant to vote as I'm not particlarly versed on the topic. Kevin Baas 01:23, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Keep, The Book of Lies is legit, according to google, An article about Aleister Crowley's version should probably be created and expanded by someone with more expertise. The disambiguation page seems reasonable, since it is a common title. siroxo 01:40, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Keep. At least half of these are legitimate works which would be eminently deserving of articles themselves, and I have no reason to believe the others aren't. - David Gerard 22:09, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Yeago 03:50, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) Agree that this book is pertinent. Perhaps 'stub' it?

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue or the deletion should be placed on other relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.