User talk:Mgream

Reflex/Tour de Future/Tera

Hi there,

Finally getting a chance to respond regarding the importance/context tags I added to your C64 demogroup articles last week. Your additions to Reflex (Australia) and Tour de Future (Australia) to justify importance/notability really only mention the C64 demoscene, which is a separate topic (see Commodore 64 demos). What readers need to know is, how were these groups important in that scene? Did they make significant releases which are mentioned in books, magazines, or websites outside of the group? Is there evidence that they played an important role in shaping the demoscene? Being a demo group of a certain platform, or from a certain country, does not make it notable nor justify an article. I do have demoscene roots but I'm thinking in terms of those both familiar and unfamiliar with it. Read WP:N for more on the notability subject. Also, bear in mind that I am not singling out your articles - I'm looking through other demo group articles as well and some are actually candidates for speedy deletion, so I'm being fair in giving them an opportunity to expand or justify their place on Wikipedia.

Thanks, --Vossanova ^o< 16:28, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Jack Thwaites.jpg

Image was uploaded with incorrect license (for educational use only) which calls for immediate deletion. The re-upload claim of permission has not been substantiated via Wikipedia:OTRS and has been listed again for deletion, this time at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion/2008 May 8 to give time for proper permission to be submitted. Simple claims of permission are not sufficient for non-free images such as this. SkierRMH (talk) 14:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:OTRS will put a confirmation on the image page when the correct permission has been received. That is the reason that the 'images for deletion' is used, so that there is ample time for said permission to be logged and recorded with the image. You may wish to re-forward any e-mails after 3 or 4 days if the image is not tagged by them.

Also, remember to "sign" your posts with a ~~~~ on talk pages, so one knows whom to reply. It's also a good idea not to erase your talk page, as it makes it impossible to track conversations (bot messages are the exception). SkierRMH (talk) 21:39, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:C64 tera australia.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:C64 tera australia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 04:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:C64 notemaker v10.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:C64 notemaker v10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 04:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Secure Video Processor

The article Secure Video Processor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Insufficient sources exist for the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Senator2029 ★ talk 21:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Notemaker

The article Notemaker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus ^(talk) 09:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tera (demogroup)

The article Tera (demogroup) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus ^(talk) 09:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Centre for Commercial Law Studies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Centre for Commercial Law Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre for Commercial Law Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Elshad (talk) 11:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)