Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botanical medicine

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:22, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Botanical medicine[edit]

reads like a dicdef, BUT could it be expanded into a full article, or redirected somewhere? I'm not sure or I'd have speedy'd it... Master Thief Garrett 09:46, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete or Redirect - there is already an article named Herbalism. There is also a re-direction link Herbal medicine which takes one to Herbalism. The term Botanical medicine conveys the same meaning as Herbal medicine. Actually, the term Herbal medicine is more in currency, in the part of the world where the term has originated. If delete is not justified, than a redirection link to Herbalism may also be considered, because a number of persons may feel more comfortable to use the term Botanical medicine as herbalism is not familiar in many part of the word.--Bhadani 14:26, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Agree with Bhadani. Redirect to Herbalism. Rick K 22:30, Apr 23, 2005 (UTC)
Redirect to Herbalism as per above. Since it's a pseudonym, it shouldn't be deleted but redirected, so that if someone searches by this more obscure name they will still find the relevant article! Master Thief Garrett 22:43, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Redirect, synonymous with Herbal medicine (which in turn already redirects to Herbalism. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 04:16, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.