Talk:Scottish Parliament

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleScottish Parliament is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 9, 2007.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 26, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 14, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
February 13, 2021Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 1, 2011, July 1, 2015, July 1, 2018, and July 1, 2019.
Current status: Former featured article

Blocking of OABot[edit]

Hey! Is there any reason OABot is specifically denied from editing this page? The denial seems to have been added in Special:Diff/1028479251 as the bot was supposedly being "malfunctional". Is this still the case, or can the bot denial be removed? Pinging Cambial Yellowing as they initiated the denial. Aidan9382 (talk) 19:49, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it was adding open access parameters where article was not open access, which then had to be undone manually. Cambial foliar❧ 20:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think it would be worth seeing if the bot has gotten any better a year later? I'm trying to reduce the overall amount of bot blocks in mainspace, as its generally not the best practice. Aidan9382 (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. No additional journal sources have been added to the page AFAIK, so there would be no meaningful test to ascertain whether this was the case. Have there been any significant changes to the code? Can’t see a changelog. Cambial foliar❧ 20:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just here to clear, I haven't exactly kept up with the bot. I'll consider doing some testing on a user subpage of my own, but for now, I'll leave the block here, just in case. Thanks for the comments! Aidan9382 (talk) 20:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link issue.[edit]

Citation 109 does not lead to the intended destination. 2A02:C7E:5423:6600:D42C:A4F6:B837:6123 (talk) 22:59, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greens in goverment.[edit]

The goverment should be Greens and SNP as two ministers are greens. I tried to change it to that but it didn’t work is anyone able to put them both under goverment? GothicGolem29 (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]