Talk:Suez Canal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New section 'Obstructions'?[edit]

Would it be advisable to create a new section entitled 'Obstructions', or perhaps a subsection under the section 'History', and include the multiple obstructions including the most recent one (Affinity V)? Compusolus (talk) 01:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Digital Microhistory Lab[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 19 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Acg22d (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Acg22d (talk) 16:17, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline section[edit]

A lot of the timeline section is already covered in the history, and acts as a trivia list. I'm going to make a start with removing duplicated facts, integrating anything that's relevant and removing anything too tangential. Timtjtim (talk) 11:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've cut out things that are already part of the history, and I've moved the the three incidents to a new section.
The remaining two trivia items are:
  • 10 January 1950: Passenger tariffs are abolished.
  • 1 January 2008: New rules of navigation passed by the Suez Canal Authority came into force together with an increase of fees for transit of about 7.1%.
Neither of these seem especially important to me - I certainly wouldn't want us to start keeping track of every price increase! I think I'm going to remove these. Timtjtim (talk) 12:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh - the latter is part of Navigation anyway Timtjtim (talk) 12:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red Sea crisis[edit]

Hello, this article doesn't mention the current Red Sea crisis, please add information about it. 190.99.107.218 (talk) 13:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to! Editors are always encouraged to be WP:BOLD! I'll note that the Suez Canal is only tangentially related to the crisis, so I don't think there's a huge amount to add! Timtjtim (talk) 17:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Suez Canal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 21:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hey, apologies: per GAN instructions, you need to be a significant contributor to the article to nominate. While you have worked on it a bit recently, it's not enough that a significant chunk is your work. (See authorship breakdown here) Especially since this is your first Good Article nomination, I would suggest doing a thorough run-through on the article improving the prose, and then co-nominate with someone else who has done a significant chunk of work on here. Great work so far, though! Before co-nominating, make sure to familiar yourself with all the sources used. You will need to be able to answer questions on a source review of these. Generalissima (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.