This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish Women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish WomenWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish WomenTemplate:WikiProject Jewish WomenJewish Women articles
This article was created or improved at an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon in 2016.ArtAndFeminismWikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminismTemplate:ArtAndFeminism articleArtAndFeminism articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.
Questioning the neutrality of the Critical reception section[edit]
By my count, in the "Critical reception" section there are nine negative reviews of Stein's works, one positive, and one neutral. It has been this way for nearly 10 years now. I don't know how to go about finding sources that might reflect the reality better (she is still widely studied in academia which would be unlikely if 90% of the world detested her as much as indicated in that section). Should this section be trimmed until a more neutral editor can provide less negative sources? SQGibbon (talk) 20:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Critical reception is meant to be critical, is it not? If you believe the article needs more neutrality, perhaps suggesting a generalized "reception" section would be more appropriate. Personally, I don't have a problem with the level of criticism presented in the article (and I believe treating it as a statistic is heavy-handed and 'agendistic'), but I do think it's rather bloated. Any famous person, especially someone radical like Stein, has plenty of people who are unhappy with them. Additionally, being studied is not a good indicator of virtue. 50.247.181.41 (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Academic criticism is not the same thing as piling on someone. I get that the words are the same, but in context they have different meanings. Academia criticism is meant to explain a work while sometimes discussing the positive and negative aspects of the work. Being critical in the sense you are using is only meant to express disdain for a work. The former is what we want in Wikipedia (and any encyclopedia), the latter doesn't belong here at all.
"Personally, I don't have a problem with the level of criticism presented in the article"
Ok, but does the section match Wikipedia guidelines and policies? It seems pretty heavily biased.
"I believe treating it as a statistic is heavy-handed and 'agendistic'"
Almost all of the negative criticism was inserted by a single editor who clearly had an agenda. All I'm trying to do is fix that initial wrong.
"Any famous person, especially someone radical like Stein, has plenty of people who are unhappy with them"
I have no problem with listing negative responses to Stein, that is fair and what Wikipedia is all about.
"being studied is not a good indicator of virtue"
I never said anything about virtue or quality. What I did say is that given how much she is studied, there must be plenty of people (including critics) who like her work and certainly more than the 10% that the previous editor implied by how they edited the section. If it really is only 10% then we need a source for this to explain the current disparity in that section. Otherwise, we should take our lead from other articles where both sides are generally presented in a fair manner with at least an appearance of equal treatment. As it stands now, that section is heavily biased. That is not how Wikipedia operates.
"I do think it's rather bloated"
That is another good argument for trimming the section down. SQGibbon (talk) 17:59, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I trimmed the section down. It still has negative view but is better balanced/more neutral. SQGibbon (talk) 22:53, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is a reference to the "Gertrude Stein Democratic Club" at Muriel Bowser. Spicemix (talk) 11:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Photo of alleged "childhood home of Gertrude Stein"[edit]
There is no known evidence in land records, utility records, etc. that the building pictured is the building where Gertrude Stein was born. Professional title examiners have searched County land records, as have persons in the business of validating such historical data. No known documents have been produced that validate that Gertrude Stein was born in the building in the photo.
The plaque on the wall of the building is an artifact, attached approximately 70 years or more after Stein's birth date, at a time when the neighborhood was attempting renovation, having been virtually abandoned by its original owners.
If someone can document the validity of the claim that Stein was born in the building in the photo, the evidence should be produced. Sapienttwo (talk) 17:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop vandalizing the article It's referenced...Modernist (talk) 17:51, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The edits aren't vandalism. Please assume good faith. PhilKnight (talk) 17:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is meant by "it's referenced'? Sapienttwo (talk) 11:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The linked material explains "reference" but not the application to "it's".
Specifically, how is the photo of a building alleged to be where GS was born "referenced" to verify that claim? Sapienttwo (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.jpg){kind=small}
.png){kind=small}
