Talk:Raph Levien

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

from Vfd[edit]

On 15 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Raph Levien for a record of the discussion. —Korath (Talk) 00:46, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Cheers! --- Charles Stewart 07:51, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

More content for article[edit]

The following should be rephrased to conform to usual standards of WP editing (or better!): I summarised Raph's contributions:

    • His work on trust metrics, especially his idea of attack resitance, which turns out to be an interesting, multiply realised idea;
    • His work on imaging software, and his leadership role in free software implementations, most notably his stewardship of the free branch of the Adobe Ghostscript software, and his libart implementation;
    • He's a significant and widely recognised voice in the free software community, which has a lot to do with starting Advogato, but has faces outside Advogato.

while User:Raph Levien summarised his own contributions:

    • In March 2000, I made a patent grant of my patent portfolio to the GPL community. This step was considered by some to be a good example, and may have been precedent for IBM's subsequent patent grant in January 2005.
    • I have not only written a number of papers on innovations in halftoning technology, but the algorithms are used in Gimp-Print, as well as by several commercial customers.
    • I did a significant amount of early work on the anonymous remailer network, including writing an early client (premail) and developing the first automated statistics-gathering tool.
    • I submitted a Commodities Jurisdiction Request for the "RSA in 4 lines of perl" t-shirt, which played a small but notable part in the ultimately successful effort to relax crypto export regulations.
    • I am at present the only other significant contributor of theorems to Metamath aside from its original author. Metamath is considered one of the Seventeen Provers of the World.
  • There is a fair amount of ongoing work which is not yet encyclopedic (including my current PhD research on splines, my design work on a next-generation Metamath, and some font designs in the queue, but my hope is that as this work progresses it will justify the continuing evolution of a wikipedia page. --Raph Levien 06:58, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Both of the above summaries are taken from the VfD discussion/vote page User:Korath posted. --- Charles Stewart 07:59, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Broken link[edit]

When trying to integrate the above text, I saw that [1] is a broken link, which was used in the patent grant section. It should be on the wayback machine, haven't time now to look right now. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Raph Levien. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]