Talk:Kargil district

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Structuring[edit]

Can someone help me structure this page in a proper way? Thanks Anwaraj (talk) 16:36, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

This second paragraph is not NPOV.

Copyright text[edit]

The whole history section is a copyright violation of this page: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-6/lns.html

In addition, there is a seperate article for the Kargil War so its not needed here anyway.

Stbalbach 22:28, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Map[edit]

I want to see a map of this. Where is this? How did India get control of it? When did Pakistan get control of it? Where is this? Guroadrunner (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to bring to the notice that majority of Kargil is Shia Muslim, while the article talks about Ismaili Shia Muslim. No local resident of Kargil is an Ismaili, majority of them are Shia Athna Ashri. So the word "Ismaili" should be removed from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.186.69.246 (talk) 06:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

S300 Indian nationalist in the loose[edit]

this editor repeatidly reverted my valid edits in the hope that indian administered kargil will not be named Administered please keep your nationalist hindutva bias to your self or just move to gujarat with modhi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.178.203 (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to bing to the notice that Nun kun Mountain are not in kargil so please change it.
Rohan (talk) 09:16, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ladakh peoples protests[edit]

It is so shame full situation that any coverage of Ladakh peoples protest against Shortage of drinking water, Lack of teachers in Indian Govt schools, erotic power supply, High air fares, Students rights, Killing of people in neighbouring Kashmir, Quota issue against Indian state Government and High court is forcefully being denied.

Is it your neutrality WP ?

I am disappointed with this cherry picking article which is just a no value article on current Ladakh population centres situation.

Every thing was sourced with 12 sources — Preceding unsigned comment added by LehPeople (talkcontribs) 12:45, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kargil district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kargil district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kargil[edit]

Tourism Anonymus786 (talk) 13:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]