Talk:Ratcliff

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

What's going on with this page? Can someone who knows please give the apparent cleanup that previous edits required. SimonMayer 20:22 Sat 28th February 2004

Spelling of Ratcliff(e)[edit]

At the very least, we should make the spelling of the headword consistent throughout the article. I'm happy to do it for this article, the one on The Highway and the Ratcliff Highway murders but I'd like to canvass opinion on which spelling to use.

Ratcliff or Ratcliffe? Google is divided on the issue. Cast your vote and I'll do the edits in a week or two.

--Dominic Sayers (talk) 14:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See my note at The Highway. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 14:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Based on a Google search of "site:towerhamlets.gov.uk ratcliffe" (97 results) and "site:towerhamlets.gov.uk ratcliff" (29 results) I guess the nearest thing we have to an official modern spelling is Ratcliffe. I have edited the articles to make the spelling consistent with this.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Ratcliff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]