Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editorial policy

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - moved to user space - SimonP 00:19, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Editorial policy

It's not that I object to editorial policies per se, but this particular page has no content and no meaning (please read it before voting, it's very short) so it doesn't belong in the Wikipedia namespace, certainly not with a title implying that it would be policy. Radiant_* 12:12, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

• We don't need an editorial board to remind us about precedents. Everyone is equal so this board wouldn't be able to make binding decision anyway. I vote userfy. so the user who started it can work out the bumps and perfect their proposal before dropping it into the big bad world. Mgm|^(talk) 13:36, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete It's been around since Oct 04 and still hasn't really become policy or otherwise gone anywhere, so probably safe to delete. If anyone wants to retry this policy proposal it's probably better to start from scratch than resuscitate this tiny article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:43, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete in agreement with Andrew. No substantial content here. Barno 14:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy to User:Stevertigo; history. Samaritan 17:36, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy. Megan1967 05:10, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Might as well Userfy until User:Stevertigo can do something more usefull with it. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 19:17, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Userfy. Good idea Samaritan. -- BD2412 ^thimkact 22:57, 2005 May 16 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.