Talk:Center for Strategic and International Studies

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

The previous version of this article was crippled by not mentioning than many controversies surrounding this think-tank.

This sad little article appears to become more information starved with each reversion by those who seem (please note the polite qualification) to want to defend the CSIS against factual information about CSIS.

It's not that I want to "defend" CSIS; in fact, you'll note that I left your information in. I simply don't trust your edits to have a neutral point of view. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 15:14, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Meelar your edits appear to consistently defend conservatives and conservative institutions. You hardly have room to complain about anyone else's edits not being neutral.

If you choose to interpret them that way, that's of course your choice. Have a nice day. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:10, 2004 Aug 1 (UTC)

read this removed link :[1]

This think tank is making the news for advocating the use of nuclear weapons against state of Iran. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100326/wl_nm/us_nuclear_iran_israel_nukes I think such radical policy prescriptions deserve mention 97.91.173.20 (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CSIS logo.jpg[edit]

Image:CSIS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:59, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Political Leanings[edit]

What are the Center's political leanings? It seems that this issue (as well as the exact identity of its funders) is avoided in this article. Badagnani 20:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: The political orientation of the CSIS is US world political, economic, and military dominance. You can read this off easily from the "Board of Trustees" section of the article --- especially the first two subsections on "CSIS Leadership" (Sam Nunn, etc) and "National Security" (Henry A. Kissinger, Counselor and Trustee, CSIS and former United States Secretary of State and United States National Security Advisor Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, Counselor and Trustee, CSIS and former United States National Security Advisor Richard L. Armitage, President, Armitage International and former United States Deputy Secretary of State Brent Scowcroft, President, the Scowcroft Group, United States Air Force Lieutenant General (ret.) and former United States National Security Advisor James L. Jones, United States Marine Corps General (ret.) and former United States National Security Advisor William S. Cohen, former United States Secretary of Defense and United States Senator from Maine Harold Brown, Former United States Secretary of Defense).

Unfortunately, the article does not discuss or even explicitly metnion this political orientation, but it is discussed in an article at http://www.voltairenet.org/article30064.html, whose link was previously removed by some CSIS enthusiast who was unfortunately also a Wikipedia editor. ---Dagme (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dagme, according to this article in the New York Times, the Center is not political at all. They merely advocate policies that serve the greater good of the U.S. and the world as a whole. Naturally, in serving the greater good, these policies will sometimes also serve the good of their corporate contributors. The Center sometimes shares its expertise with legislators. This is not lobbying. The Center does not lobby. They are not required to register as lobbyists, or disclose their contributors. Contributions are tax-deductible.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/us/politics/think-tanks-research-and-corporate-lobbying.html

Researchers or Corporate Allies?

Think Tanks Blur the Line

Think tanks are seen as independent, but their scholars often push donors’ agendas, amplifying a culture of corporate influence in Washington.

By ERIC LIPTON and BROOKE WILLIAMS

AUG. 7, 2016

--Nbauman (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CSIS logo.jpg[edit]

Image:CSIS logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Project on Nuclear Issues into Center for Strategic and International Studies[edit]

I fail to see how Project on Nuclear Issues meets our notability guidelines but such information might be relevant to this article. JayJay^{What did I do?} 02:23, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 19:42, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]