Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pisarcik

Pisarcik

Pisarcik was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedily delete (another admin did this). - Ta bu shi da yu 02:44, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC) Stupid neologism made up by a couple of kids from Rhode Island. The surname of some other kid. - Vague | Rant 05:39, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC) Delete. [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 05:51, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

I go to Brown University in Providence, and I frequently hear this term. A pisarcik is a man with an unusually small penis. This is just the lingo we use around here and there is no reason it should not be defined by Wikipedia.

• Comment: The above by the article's author, an anon with no other contributions. Andrewa 19:25, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

It's a real term, widely accepted in my experience.Keep. [[User:Jordan L.|Jordan L. (Talk)]] 06:08, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

• Comment: The above by a similar IP to the article author, an anon whose only other contribution has been reverted as vandalism. Andrewa 19:25, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• The fact that it is used isn't enough reason to include it in an ancyclopedia. Delete for reason of non-notableness. Wyllium 07:36, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)

This vote was made by anon IP User:138.16.6.176. Mike H 06:10, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

• • Hahah. I like how he copied squash's sig. - Vague | Rant 11:20, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, delete, delete. Unnotable university slang that amounts to a personal attack upon a student. --Slowking Man 07:05, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)

• Delete There are probably a million slang terms used in a million schools, offices, or whatever. This is not the place to list them, let alone devote articles to them. Rossrs 08:45, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Even speedy delete for personal attack. Geogre 16:26, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. --Improv 18:21, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Deleted. Not the vaguest suggestion of any reason to keep it even for the deletion period. I'll restore it if anyone really wants to see it, or provide a copy on request. Andrewa 19:32, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Grounds for speedy delete is #3. Andrewa 19:43, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.