Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JUSTIN RUDDY

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

JUSTIN RUDDY

JUSTIN RUDDY was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Article already deleted.

Vanity. --fvw* 01:10, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)

• seems like a speedy to me. — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 01:16, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • On what grounds? Please see the list of speedy deletion criteria. --fvw* 01:36, 2004 Dec 13 (UTC)
• Unfortunately, this did not meet any of the current specific criteria for speedy deletion. Undeleted to allow the VfD discussion to complete. Delete as vanity (hopefully, after moving to the appropriate user page). Rossami (talk) 02:17, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete vanity. Gazpacho 10:55, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. He's an "IT consultant with a broken capslock key". [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson [T|C]]] 17:47, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete vanity or joke Carole a 05:19, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete - I love the "amature". Deb 16:07, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.