Talk:Charles Keeping

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:SutcliffBloodFeud.jpg[edit]

Image:SutcliffBloodFeud.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

{{Authority control}} in the article footer links LC and other catalog data.

1967 and 1981 winners at Greenaway Medal Living Archive (2007?). CILIP.

--P64 (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The two retrospective citations by CILIP are in the article for some time now.
WorldCat lists this work about Keeping, genre Catalog.
* [1] Children's and illustrated books (London: Henry Sotheran Ltd, 2010); 73p. ill. (chiefly col.) — Arthur Rackham; Errol Le Cain; Lewis Carroll; Helen Oxenbury; Charles Keeping
Does it include any valuable text: introduction, blurbs, captions?
--P64 (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further reading, Citations, Works about Keeping[edit]

This article was reasonably complete on its birthday 18:20, 4 December 2004‎ and moreso six months later 15:36, 28 May 2005‎ Nicknack009‎, still essentially the work of a single editor. Meanwhile section "Further reading" previously in the middle of the article dates from this September/October with two listings that duplicate the original pair plus two new ones.

Evidently the two new ones have not been used as sources, so I have retained the heading "Further readings" for them, and relocated them in the footer, which is appropriate to the heading.

The other two remain listed at the bottom of section References where I have labeled them "Citations" which anticipates that they will be used to provide {{more footnotes}} (and which also makes them easier to see).

See Anne McCaffrey#References for an expert editor's demonstration of technique utilizing such Citations.
See an extremely cheap alternative that fulfills the reference function if the page numbers match.[2]

It may be appropriate to list (perhaps selected) Works about Someone in the body of Someone's biography but we don't even list (perhaps selected) Works by Keeping here. (I think it would be overkill here, anyway; this isn't C. S. Lewis#Bibliography.)

Here we cover Keeping's publications only discursively (beyond the infobox list of four notable works). It may be appropriate to do handle some publications about Keeping in the same way, in a section called Reception or Commentary or Controversy or etc.

--P64 (talk) 19:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Charles Keeping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Charles Keeping. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]