Category talk:Airports in California

	Aviation portal This category is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This category is supported by the airport project.

California

This category is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles

definition[edit]

I suggest we broaden the scope of this category to include airfields, private and public, and airstrips too, even if they are not general aviation airfields to include flying fields for remote controlled planes, or any airstrip with a runway longer than 300 feet or something like that to be more illusionist and state this on the category brief that this doesn't necessarily denote that the place is a "real" airport.^MY♥_INchile 18:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This category is under Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation and its subproject Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports. The precedent is already long-since established to require an airport to minimally have an ICAO, IATA and/or FAA airport code in order to begin the process of even starting an airport article. You've been told this before such as on Talk:Breuner_Airfield. Please do not repeatedly bring up the same topic on various article and category talk pages like you have been doing on a daily basis. It amounts to a campaign of proof by assertion and is disruptive editing due to the time it wastes for other editors to point out that you've already been told this standard exists on Wikipedia. Ikluft (talk) 07:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

per another user's comment i brought it up here. precedent is not policy, wikipedia is not written in stone, why are you so insistent that i don't even bring up the matter? i am talk, just talk back. and being "told" makes it sound like i have been ordered, that is not the case, you keep telling me, that's it. just calm down already. and i challenge both that that there is some unwritten precedent and that i am editing disruptively by discussion instead of editing on a disputed matter.^MY♥_INchile 18:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I gave you the answer with references. Obviously you want to ignore the answer since you post the same question on a different talk page on a daily basis - that certainly is disruptive editing and is an example listed on the page. Consensus is established for the worldwide topic of airports - it has to be officially an airport with an ICAO, IATA or FAA code. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports. Ikluft (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See the related note about forum shopping at User talk:Myheartinchile#Forum-shopping for miscategorizing Breuner Airfield as an airport which refers to this talk page. Ikluft (talk) 01:43, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]