Talk:Liang Fa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Source consulted during the article writing:

--Menchi 02:07 28 Jun 2003 (UTC)

Name[edit]

Just a note. It seems that in most Western sources the man is known as Liang Afa. Since this is an English language article it might be good to feature this name a bit more prominently and include it in search results (since Afa is what westerners will be looking for.) Zotlan 20:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — LlywelynII 03:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess[edit]

I understand the "some Chinaman" attitude of the Brits during this period but you can't cite Davies for Liang's work when Davies doesn't mention any Chinese workers at all.

  • Davies, Evan (1846), The Memoir of Samuel Dyer: Sixteen Years Missionary to the Chinese, London: John Snow, p. 142.

is only a source for Dyer's work in Malaysia, which is irrelevant to this article. You need some source saying that Liang was involved with it.

There are entire paragraphs of this article that aren't about Liang at all. The passage on Hobson belongs in his article ( Done) and this

{{chinese |t={{linktext|周|學}} |s= |p= |altname= Chau Lai-Tong |t2={{linktext|周|勵|堂}} |s2= |p2= }} The Methodist Church in England sent missionary [[George Piercy]] to China.<ref>{{citation |url=https://archive.org/stream/handbookofmethod00john/handbookofmethod00john_djvu.txt |title=? }}.</ref> In 1851, Piercy went to Guangzhou, where he worked in a trading company. In 1853, he started a church in Guangzhou. In 1877, Chau was ordained by the Methodist Church, where he pastored for 39 years (incumbent 1877-1916).

belongs with an article on Hok Chau, not here. — LlywelynII 03:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for article expansion[edit]

Much more at McNeur, including this affecting passage regarding his punishment and details re: his wife. — LlywelynII 00:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

also has missing details, such as the bit about his home life here. — LlywelynII 00:51, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Xiuquan[edit]

This article strongly implies that Liang Fa distributed his works to Hong Xiuquan. Jen Yu-wen in The Taiping Revolutionary Movement 14 (1973) claims this is not possible (and IIRC other books have stated the same). The link to the PDF source backing up this claim appears to be broken. Is there any recent, credible scholarship in support of this claim? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbrote (talkcontribs) 06:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liang Fa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]