Talk:Solomon Kane

Novels: Short story / Fantasy Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article is supported by Fantasy task force.

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Weapons[edit]

Regarding Kanes flintlocks it's mentioned that "a more historically probable firearm would be Wheellock". Would it? Following the link to wheellock you can read: "[wheellock was] Developed around AD 1500, it was used alongside the matchlock and was later superseded by the snaphance (1560s) and the flintlock (c. 1600)." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.2.185 (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

Removed this passgae as it's POV;

Although a noble man of good intentions, there are subtle hints through all of the Solomon Kane stories that point towards Kane suffering a form of severe insanity usually found amongst religious fanatics.

quercus robur 13:29, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

The article cites the most recent and authoritative compilation of the Kane stories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AusJeb (talk • contribs) 22:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon, different[edit]

The redactor, or some editor of this article makes a big deal of how Solomon Kane is so different from other Howardian heroes... I beg to differ. While he may not be built on the big thewed brutish model... he's no that different... he still is very strong, though he looks spare, has that pantherish litheness so often found in Howard's characters, has the black mane and terrible eyes of many of Howard's characters (however he chooses to describe it), is a man of action, has a lot oftrouble with ancient, supernatural foes... oh, yeah, he is more visibly than many able to use his head to do more than support a helmet... but that is forgetting that many Howardian characters are noted for mental achievements : Conan is a peerless linguinst even though he's no scholar, Kull is well known to be moody and introspective, Kirowan is a scholar in his own right and keeps to like company... need more parallels? Despite superficial differences, Kane is indeed cast in the Howardian mold. --Svartalf 22:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership edits[edit]

See Talk:Bran Mak Morn#Ownership edits. 69.182.106.50 19:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Racism accusations[edit]

I think describing Howard as a racist, let alone a virulent one, is a bit of a serious accusation to make without casually at the end of a paragraph without expanding upon or justifying it in any way. Perhaps it is true, but it really should be supported. Have also tweaked the paragraph as a whole, hope no-one minds...

You're correct, but most of that section needed to be deleted anyway, because it was original research and opinion. (That's what all those little "citation needed" notes meant.) I deleted most of it. Rray 11:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Update of movie[edit]

In my edit summary for my update of the proposed film's status, I was trying to say that this info was via writer/director Bassett's own website, but for the second time in half an hour, while writing---or in this case, revising---my edit summary, the system suddenly "Saved"! I hope this is not a new habit. Ted Watson 22:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed request for references[edit]

The books and the commentary are enough already. This business of asking for external references for things that are internally referenced is a waste of time. Do you actually want references to the references to the references of the list of Howards books? Bah! Parsnip13 00:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Blades of the Brotherhood/Blue Flame of Vengeance"[edit]

I remember reading somewhere that Blue Flame of Vengeance was not simply an alternate title for Blades of the Brotherhood, but the title of an alternate version. It was rewritten to add a horror-fantasy element, and was published, I think, in the 1950s (the first time the story ever saw public exposure). As I can't track down a reference to back me up, don't know who did the rewrite, and am not certain it happened in the '50s, I won't put it in the article myself. Can anybody do better? Ted Watson (talk) 20:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The story's original title was "The Blue Flame of Vengeance". Later, a rewritten version using the same title appeared. In a subsequent printing, Glenn Lord used the title "Blades of the Brotherhood" to distinguish the true Robert E Howard text from the rewritten version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.152.186.14 (talk) 06:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roleplaying Game[edit]

The amount of attention (i.e., full chapter listing) seems excessive in the scope of this article. That sort of thing might be appropriate if the RPG had its own article. I'd recommend trimming it down, at the very least removing the chapter list. Sangrolu (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No response after 1 week; I abbreviated the RPG entry. Sangrolu (talk) 22:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Solomon Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]