Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supernerd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Supernerd[edit]

This is a neologism and original research (according to the article itself), and does therefore not belong in an encyclopedia (According to the wikipedia guidelines). Thue | talk 15:58, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete has no real purpose and is original research. Therefore, it should be deleted. --Computerjoe 16:35, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete he also created a copy, see below, but I was slower at vfding it. We should merge them somehow... Grue 16:41, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Coolgamer 16:53, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Supernerd has/had the same nonsense content. Jeff Knaggs 16:50, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Seems more fitting for a slang dictionary. Coolgamer 16:51, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • del Mikkalai 18:05, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete Spinboy 20:29, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: If you're really special, you don't need to call yourself anything. (Original "research," POV, nonsense.) Geogre 22:05, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete neologism, nonsense. Gazpacho 03:22, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete stupid neologism.
  • Superdelete for all the reasons stated above. [[User:Livajo|力伟|]] 06:17, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Redirect to nerds in denial. -- Chaz
    • Comment from 198.82.71.55.
  • Delete as vanity project of a bunch of people who are too nerdy to realize that adding the "super" prefix just makes them sound that much more pathetic. DreamGuy 10:38, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Supernerds are a real phenomena. The term may be a few months old but this is spreading fast. Google already lists over 9000 hits so it's a real term. I am a supernerd and I can see all the Wikinerds on here up in arms trying to surpress us! But we will fight on. Least us supernerds don't waste time trying to delete the truth! -- Supernerd. 11:31, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC).
  • Delete. Keep fighting the power. Gamaliel 11:36, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Microneologism. Tempshill 22:03, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: moronic, POV, neologism, unverified, does not establish notability... the list goes on - rernst 13:59, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)