User talk:Andrejj

For fast response use: sl:Uporabniški pogovor:Andrejj

Welcome and thanks

Hi there Andrejj! Welcome to Wikipedia.

Thanks for creating University of Zagreb, that page has been on my to-do list for ages now, you did a great job in one quick swoop. :)

If you have any questions, see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. You can also ask lowly Wikipedians like myself if you need anything.

Thanks again and good luck. --Joy [shallot] 14:56, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks, beside small changes, this is my first attempt in English Wiki. I hope there's no bigger mistake, although article can still be improved. I'am rather working in Slovene Wikipedia. --andrejj 15:12, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Vidmar

the language is Dutch.! Thank you for the correction best wishes Jaap vd Kooij

Image:Triglav z Debele peci.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Triglav z Debele peci.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

On Commons RedWolf 17:01, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Zdravo, brate Slovenac! :) HolyRomanEmperor 19:40, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Image replaced and up for deletion

Hi, I've replaced the image Image:Sign diameter.jpg, uploaded by you, with Image:Sign diameter.png because PNG is a more suitable format for images with no photographic content. The original image has been listed for deletion—hope this is OK. –Mysid 07:21, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:University of zagreb Coat.gif)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:University of zagreb Coat.gif. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Reply: Novo Mesto Request

Hi Jose, could you translate basic facts about Novo Mesto (my home town) to the Chinese Mandarin language. Tnx in advance. --AndrejJ 17:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem! the article will be created soon. --Jose77 20:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Done! View Here --Jose77 03:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Category:International Judges of Chess Compositions

I think that adding usual wikipedia categories listing usual articles to user pages is not good idea, so much for Category:International Judges of Chess Compositions on my user page. On the other hand, I am sure there are many more important chess composition judges and chess composers deserving their own Wikipedia entries than me. Maybe once I will be at the beginning of the queue :-) Ruziklan 22:17, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Primož Jakopin

Please read WP:BIO, and ask yourself if this article establishes notability for the individual. If it doesn't, you can add the persons notability, however you must include sources so it can be verified. --Porqin 13:25, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Generally a persons homepage isn't the best source for information that is to be included inside an encyclopedia. Reading his homepage, I don't see what makes him notable enough to be inlcuded in an encyclopedia. --Porqin 13:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Jakopin

Hi,

The expertise of this gentleman is outside of my own range of abilites; however, I noted problems with his article because of the nature of the sources given: the lack of English language sources does raise possible verifiability problems at English Wikipedia. I freely admit that I have no firm opinion here, and am using the deletion processes as a means to solicit involvement of editors more knowledgeable of this area. The PRODing, by the way, was done by me after removing a speedy deletion tag. Now that you have contested the PROD, I must decide whether to proceed to an AfD. Best wishes, Xoloz 00:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Chesscomposer

Hi AndrejJ,

please use the (new) category "Chesscomposer" in Wikipedia Commons.--88.72.33.191 10:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Gratitude

THANKYOU VERY MUCH Andrejj for the excellent-quality translation effort!

May God bless you!

(In the future, If you need any articles to be translated to the Chinese language, I would gladly help you)

Yours Sincerely, from --Jose77 23:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm nominating "Krka (disambig)" for deletion

Please note: I am nominating Krka (disambig) for deletion.
You are shown in the history as having edited this page.
If you wish to object, check the details by clicking the link above.

Regards, JohnI 18:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Impossible Puzzle

(In Slovenian for the sake of simplicity) Tale članek ima kar zanimivo zgodovino brisanja. Enkrat je bil zbrisan kot copyvio, enkrat pa po postopku AfD. Slednji je imel tole vsebino (brez predlog):

---

An impossible puzzle is a puzzle that cannot be solved by following its directions or criteria.

Example of an impossible puzzle

There are six circles, three on top and three on the bottom arranged in a two-by-three manner. Each circle contains a letter. The top left-hand circle contains the letter A. The top middle circle contains the letter B. The top right circle contains the letter C. The bottom left-hand circle contains the letter X. The bottom middle circle contains the letter Y. And the bottom right circle contains the letter Z. The idea is to draw three paths from A (one to each of X, Y, & Z), draw three paths from B (to X, Y, & Z), and three paths from C (to X, Y, & Z), so that no two paths cross each other. Using a third dimension or going through a letter is illegal.

Impossible puzzles

• Three cottage problem
• Seven Bridges of Königsberg

External links

• Supposed Solution to the Impossible Puzzle
• Proof That the Impossible Puzzle is Impossible
• Three Utilities Puzzle at cut-the-knot

---

Še kaj v zvezi s tem rabiš? LP --Tone 08:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Ne, mišljeno je bilo predvsem v smislu preverjanja, preden kdo predlaga članek za brisanje - tako kot predlagajo nizozemsko različico, ker da je besedilo uganke copyvio. --AndrejJ 10:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Potem ni problema, copyvio besedilo je govorilo o nečem iz teorije grafov. V tem primeru lepo citiraš avtorja in ne vidim problemov... Mogoče bi kdo kompliciral, če bi direktno prepisal postopek reševanja (mimogrede, kakšen namig, kako se lotiti problema, ne bi škodil). LP --Tone 10:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Delam na tem, da primerno preoblikujem besedilo. Je pa načelno vprašanje: mnogi prispevki iz časov Useneta, ko so se take stvari "štele" za splošno dobro. Ali meniš, da je načeloma lahko besedilo (katerekoli) uganke copyvio? --AndrejJ 11:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Fairy chess edit

Yes, that is a good start for problem oriented fairy chess page, well done. I have further split conditions to stipulations and fairy conditions as is most usual today and made some minor edits inside. --Ruziklan 13:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Well done in grasshopper! You motivate me more and more to write something as well... --Ruziklan 10:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Kenguru logotip.png

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kenguru logotip.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Ana Srebrnič

Hello, my answers to your question on Talk:Ana Srebrnič. SyG 13:36, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Aljažev stolp

An article that you have been involved in editing, Aljažev stolp, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aljažev stolp. Thank you. Sawblade05 ^{(talk to me | my wiki life)} 08:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Valerian Onitiu

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Valerian Onitiu, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Valerian Onitiu is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Valerian Onitiu, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Valerian Onitiu

An editor has nominated Valerian Onitiu, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerian Onitiu and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleting references

Please, do not delete the references I included in the article (Žumberak/Gorjanci). That is not recomended practice. --Ante Perkovic (talk) 02:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I put another reference into the article.--AndrejJ (talk) 05:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jolanda Ceplak fotofinis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jolanda Ceplak fotofinis.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pauly 1912 selfmate.png

Can you explain why you tagged that image for speedy deletion? You left no reason, and anyway, it's public domain. - Revolving Bugbear 13:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Derive zaslonska slika.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Derive zaslonska slika.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Slovenia

You are welcome to join WikiProject Slovenia . We need as many Slovene members as possible!!

♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 21:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi I;ve created the below template for Celje. Could you help translate the red links for the places into english and help expand or add them. I;ve started a few stubs but can't speak the language unfortunately although I have learnt a few words such as grad and dom etc. Some fo the districts I;ve started have pages on SLovenian wiki ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 13:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Gooddays

(let's have this in English) The problem with User:Gooddays you notified me about a couple of days ago has now escalated into a case of accusations, blocks and sockpuppets. A concern has been expressed that this user is an incarnation of a banned user. I don't remember anyone who would do such things before, do you have any suspects on the case? The user and his sockpuppet are currently blocked for disruptive editing. --Tone 13:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no idea. --AndrejJ (talk) 12:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Zdravko Jelinčič

In future, do not blank my edits without leaving some form of explanation either on the talk page or the edit summary. It matters not whether I am right or wrong in the affair, an edit struggle will ensue until whoever is right can start to explain himself. Empty passages mean nothing. I had a genuine reason to believe that the map may have been created by Zmago, and that someone may have misquoted his name; sadly, I hadn't hitherto heard of Zdravko, and his name clearly doesn't have an article on WP, and his writings in 1987 are not exactly an indication that he lived 200 years before Zmago either. But by unexplainedly undoing an edit, you've made it look like I have commited vandalism which I never do. So please use the edit summary to explain your reverts. Evlekis (talk) 06:48, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

When I revert vandalism I use common summary rvv; sorry for any inconvenience.--AndrejJ (talk) 09:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

No problems, I see how you do things now. On another note, do you know enough about Zdravko do start a proper article about him, or do you feel he is not notable enough? Evlekis (talk) 07:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Statistics you wanted so badly

Most of the Slovene Wikipedia has been written by only one person (Klemen Kocjancic)

sl:Uporabnik:Klemen Kocjancic/Seznam Wikipedistov po ustvarjenih člankih -- Imbris (talk) 22:09, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Klemen is (was) very active editor, but 20.000 entries (most of which which is far from articles) does not mean that he wrote most of the Slovenian Wikipedia. --AndrejJ (talk) 07:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Ana Srebrnič

Dear Andrejj, you wrote that Ana Srebrnič was born in Nova Gorica. FIDE says here that she was born in Ljubljana. The Croation Chess Association wrote Ljubljana as well in this application. What makes you think that she was born in Nova Gorica? Best regards, --Gereon K. (talk) 12:40, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

You are right, corrected. --AndrejJ (talk) 16:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

RfD notification

The redirect WikiTaxi you have been involved in editing was listed for discussion. The reason was: "A cross-namespace redirect from the term often used also outside Wikipedia." If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 July 7. Thank you. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 19:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Noam Elkies

Yes, I am aware of that, but the category chess grandmasters is reserved for regular grandmasters. We have a Category:Correspondence chess grandmasters, but we don't have a category for GM solvers/problemist as yet, and so I put Elkies in the category chess problemists. Voorlandt (talk) 20:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

chess diagram

I saw your change of "xw" to "xx" in cross-check. "xw" used to make a white dot, but now the file seems to be missing. A member of the Chess project made a change to the template today, could that have affected it? I don't understand enough about this to fix it. Do you? Bubba73 (talk), 20:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Now the white dots are working again. Bubba73 (talk), 20:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Software for handling chess problems

They were in <ref></ref> tags, and I was about to put them back at the bottom, but you pinged me :) LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 05:31, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Done LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 05:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Walter Wolf: linking dates

I've replied at my talk page. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 07:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Trdinov vrh/Sveta Gera

Please, add your request to move the article also to the list at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Thanks. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 08:43, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kenkensolution.png

Diagram updated. -- SGBailey (talk) 22:12, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Agreed draw vs. threefold repetition draw

You seem to be confused with some of the rules of chess as demonstrated in your edits to 38th Chess Olympiad. A draw by agreement is when both players mutually decide to end the game with a drawn result at any time. A threefold repetition is a technical draw where one player makes a claim to the arbiter that a position has been repeated three times, and then the arbiter will confirm this and declare the game over and the result a draw. The rules of the 38th Olympiad prohibit draw by agreement before the 30th move. That rule does not cover draws by repetition in any way, nor should it. They are two entirely different outcomes, in terms of the application of this rule. Thus your addition to the article makes no sense. It is kind of like saying "Tournament players were not allowed to wear red to the event. Yet, Vladimir Kramnik showed up wearing blue!" Do you see how that is nonsense, and is confusing to the reader? --SubSeven (talk) 21:23, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I'm not confused. What it your opinion about the following (extreme) game: 1. Nf3 Nc6 2. Ng1 Nb8 3. Nf3 Nc6 4. Ng1 Nb8 5. Nf3 Nc6 6. Ng1 Nb8 draw. Is this: a) threefold repetition b) hidden agreement or c) joking with the arbiter!?

See: Draw_by_agreement#Steps_taken_to_discourage_draws_or_short_draws

In 1962 FIDE reinstated a version of the rule against draws by agreement in fewer than thirty moves, with the director allowing them in exceptional circumstances. FIDE had the intention of enforcing the rule and the penalty was a loss of the game by both players. However, players ignored it or got around it by intentional threefold repetition. --AndrejJ (talk) 21:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

If you're alleging that Khenkin and Wotjaszek pre-arranged their game, then you should come out and say it (I hope you have a source for it). Games being drawn by repetition in fewer than 30 moves is something that has always occurred now and then; it is not a phenomenon created by any FIDE anti-draw rules. So, just the fact that there was a game out of thousands that was quickly drawn by repetition is not in any way noteworthy. --SubSeven (talk) 23:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

I (and nobody except players) can't say nothing about agreement. I was just pointing to the short (shortest?) game. --AndrejJ (talk) 05:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Slovenian

You are invited to join WikiProject Intertranswiki and join Wikipedia:WikiProject Intertranswiki/Slovenian. It is intended to be a joint group between Intertranswiki and WikiProject Slovenia of which you are already a part of The aim is to draw up a directory of missing articles from Slovenian wikipedia, extract what is notable or suitable, and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge between other wikipedias. Even if you can't contribute much in starting content, your help is much needed to help draw up detailed lists of missing articles for Slovenia in the new project space and help other editors work through lists to build content more fully. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 10:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Georg Mohr (chess player)

Hi, Andrej! Please add newly created articles to the list at P:SLO/A. This way we may monitor all of them from the same place via Special:Recentchangeslinked. Thanks and regards. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 15:07, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

OK. --AndrejJ (talk) 15:17, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Tone Pavček, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ironholds (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/193.198.7.30 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. WikiTome ^Talk 10:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:52, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Popeye (chess) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Popeye (chess) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Popeye (chess) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marasmusine (talk) 16:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Reproduction of Slovenian currency for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reproduction of Slovenian currency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reproduction of Slovenian currency until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Eleassar ^{my talk} 17:42, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Slovenian help needed

Hello Andrejj, I'm contacting you because we need some Slovenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sl.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Slovenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:18, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Deletion at "University of Zagreb"

Hi Andrejj, please watch the behavior of the user Sveuciliste1669 at the site "University of Zagreb" - he's deleting the article about discrimination without any comment! (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Zagreb&diff=640220829&oldid=640205550) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amelung10 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrejj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrejj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andrejj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Mathematical Kangaroo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mathematical Kangaroo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mathematical Kangaroo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 15:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrejj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Andrejj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Europeana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Europeana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Europeana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 14:23, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of universities in Slovenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New University. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)