another interesting edit war =[edit]

Yes I saw your edit this morning. Another great editing controverse is the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/BCE-CE Debate/Discussion. People have been going back and forth over whether BC is NPOV or not. Read my opinion there. MPS 19:57, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

premoderns[edit]

I see what you're doing. (1) I wonder how this content overlaps with or contradicts information in the series Middle Ages--> Renaissance--> Early modern Europe. (2) You should add a box at the bottom a box that directs to the similar progression pre-modern --> modern--> postmodern (or somthing). (3) I wonder if, like the Dark Ages , the term "pre-modern" is sort of a loaded term. Other examples would be like Eretz Israel and Insurgent. In this case, you might want to bracket everything stated so it's more like, "people talk about the pre-modern era in such and such a way" in contrast to modern and postmodern thinking MPS 13:52, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Re your message. I copied the other template and put in some basic words that you can fool around with. Template:Modernism Framework. When you want it to show up as a template, but it in brackets like this (see code in edit mode)

Image:Dogpoo.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Dogpoo.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go to its page to provide the necessary information.

--Tabor 19:49, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dog poop girl[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dog poop girl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - -The Spooky One (talk to me) 21:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dog poop girl[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dog poop girl, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Per the precedent of deleting articles like YouTube_cat_abuse_incident, this article does not demonstrate lasting notability as an internet meme

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fritzpoll (talk) 17:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dog poop girl[edit]

I have nominated Dog poop girl, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dog poop girl (4th nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fritzpoll (talk) 09:30, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]