Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croydon Gateway

Croydon Gateway

Not notable. --fvw* 00:27, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)

• Keep: cleanup and merge into the Croydon article. Re-written inro NPOV it merits a mention as it seems like a large issue in the locality and will impact the future of the Borough. Thryduulf 01:10, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

following rewrite, I strengthen my keep vote and withdraw my merge request. Thryduulf 09:19, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Marginal Delete. Notable in only a very small area, and the article needs a top-to-bottom rewrite to eliminate POV and snide remarks. Might be worth merging into the main article on Croydon. 23skidoo 01:21, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I don't know how to do strikethroughs, so I'm going to change by vote this way to a marginal keep given the promise by Philip, below, to do a rewrite. 23skidoo 05:46, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

To strikethrough text, use <s> and </s>, or <strike> and </strike>. Thus: I vote yes no on such-and-such. —tregoweth 06:00, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Maybe not notable in Holland but very much so in Croydon. Keep but cleanup. Merge if anyone can be bothered. Dr Zen 01:43, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Croydon and redirect -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 01:46, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC) New vote below -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 20:22, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Merge anything useable to Croydon, then add redirect. Megan1967 04:02, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, it's helpful but needs cleanup and PoV scrub, I added a cleanup tag. Wyss 04:35, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Please do not merge. This is not an obscure project, but has had national media coverage. I will rewrite it and put it in the Redevelopment projects in London category I created as well as the Croydon category. Philip 05:24, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Now rewritten. Philip 06:07, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Better now. Salazar 06:26, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Rewrite is much better and a proposal for a 10,000 seat arena in London seems notable enough in my book.Capitalistroadster 09:31, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Extremely strong keep now, with the rewrite. Don't merge! Samaritan 10:35, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Strong keep following rewrite. Scheme has had and will continue to have national impact, about which I have added some information - it has been going on for forty years! Mtiedemann 11:55, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. --JuntungWu 12:26, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Change of vote to keep following re-write. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 20:22, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.