Talk:English Schools Foundation
 | The article Sha Tin Junior School was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 6 April 2024 with a consensus to merge the content into English Schools Foundation. If you find that such action has not been taken promptly, please consider assisting in the merger instead of re-nominating the article for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use this talk page. Do not remove this template after completing the merger. A bot will replace it with {{afd-merged-from}}. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Glenealy School was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 August 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into English Schools Foundation. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 12changk2.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comments[edit]
There are broken links in for the Primary Schools, like Kennedy School and Beacon Hill School. I think someone will need to redirect it to somewhere senseble.
spoon@sis.myschools.net
I would like to add a section on controversies just to provide context. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12changk2 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Major restructuring[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have completed a major restructuring of the article. The new version of the article shifts the focus towards ESF's admissions and academics, away from things such as the ordinance and the debate about ESF's subvention so that the content of the article is now more relevant.
There are a few minor edits that still need to be made. The lead section needs to be updated to reflect the new content in the body, and it would be nice if we could update all of the sources if possible because the information will not be current in the new decade. We should also review the content in the article, and perhaps shorten some of the less important sections.
I hope we can raise this article to a C-Class standard through these edits. Keep on editing guys!
Best wishes,
Toby
Threedotshk (talk) 10:00, 7 December 2019 (UTC)