Talk:Rahowa (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Good work, you guys. DJ Clayworth 14:11, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Record of deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/RAHOWA_(band). Consensus to keep. DJ Clayworth 15:03, 30 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Stop adding the lyrics to "Third Reich" just to "prove your point". Those lyrics are obviously satiric, which I'm sure you damn well know. I will keep deleting them if they pop up here. (posted by anon)

Well a White Supremacist band singing songs about killing Jews and Blacks doesn't seem to me to be 'obviously satiric'. Do you have any evidence to back it up? Anyway if they are 'obviously satiric' then all our readers will realise they are satiric and no harm will be done by including the lyrics here. A direct quote gives a much better indication of the kind of song sung by RaHoWa than any academic description could. DJ Clayworth 21:02, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone added a 'cleanup' tag to this article, which was without the need for any such tag for many months now. Whoever added it should explain why they added it, or it will be removed. DJ Clayworth 05:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure where the lyrics to the Nancy Sinatra song come from, anyone care to post a source? This band is obviously quite controversial, thus a source for such controversial lyrics is needed. SchwarzeSonne

If it wasn't for NPOV, I'd re-write this article slagging off these bastards for defaming metal and being a detriment to the human race. Scum.

Well, I suppose I could understand that. Concerning genres, the metal-archives classifies them as goth metal, not neoclassical metal, and having heard a few samples, I could say that this definition is more fitting, given the music's melancholic mood and the vocalists approach. I will change the article to reflect this; should anyone disagree, feel free to prove me wrong. Cronos12390 00:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Alright it has been changed to say "Goth metal with neo-classical elements". This seems more appropriate to me.Cronos12390 01:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rahowadisc2.jpg[edit]

Image:Rahowadisc2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rahowadisc1.gif[edit]

Image:Rahowadisc1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 13:46, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]



– Per WP:MOSTRADE. Wikipdia doesn't do funny spellings, they can always change tomorrow. This article should be moved. If every band on this whole site was typed exactly in the font or funny spelling that they appear on the album cover, articles all over this site would look like 2008 Myspace kid usernames. Second Skin (talk) 17:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.