Talk:NCAA men's ice hockey championship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Does anyone else think the school names on this list could/should be linked to their Wikipedia entries? MrItty 13:49, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Division II Tournament[edit]

Why wasn't it held from 85-92? I think it probably deserves an explanation --X96lee15 16:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CCHA.jpg[edit]

Image:CCHA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CHA.jpg[edit]

Image:CHA.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing tag[edit]

Is there anything in the article where the NCAA's record book is not an adequate source? --Mr Wednesday (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge[edit]

I tagged and am proposing a merge between this page and Frozen Four. Frozen Four is just a term that referes to the semi's and the finals of the NCAA championships. I don't see any need for both. Comments? -Mitico (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. -Mitico (talk) 12:41, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New discussion[edit]

"Frozen Four" is ambiguous -- it could refer to any of four tournaments (men's and women's, D-I and D-III). It should at least be a disambiguation page. Powers T 15:54, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • This page covers the Men's D-I & D-III tournament. So the disambiguation page would just be between the men's vs. women's pages. I was conscientious of this distinction and attempted to address it by wikilinking "Women's Frozen Four" in the lead. If you think this is confusing or misleading, I see no problem with proceeding with a disambiguation page for the two articles. -Mitico (talk, contribs) 16:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Changed my mind. By looking at What links here for the Frozen Four it appears that most links are targeting the men's tournament. If anything, at hatnote to the women's tournament may make sense. Mitico (talk, contribs) 16:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • With due respect, I'm not sure you can go by "What links here". Why would someone who wanted to link the women's tournament link to a redirect to this article? Powers T 19:20, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "What links here" is a consideration for determining the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. - Mitico (talk, contribs) 20:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sure, but you seemed to indicate that was the deciding factor. At any rate, I guess a hatnote would probably be sufficient, but I think the link to the women's tournament article should be clearer somehow. Powers T 21:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frozen Four Appearances[edit]

Shouldn't there be a table for total number of Frozen Four appearances?VictorsValiant09 (talk) 20:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on NCAA Men's Ice Hockey Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]