Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lockwood
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - all deleted - SimonP 03:13, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
James Lockwood, King's College Conservatives, 2001club[edit]
According to personal bio - a local student association organizer. This does not meet notability criteria. Vote for delete
Lotsofissues 10:51, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
additional notes, user has also created King's College Conservatives 2001club mentioning vfd candidate and email so these entries are likely vanity/self promotion. What does everyone want to do with those two contributions? Lotsofissues 11:02, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- is there a way to modify the vfd template so we could put it on multiple pages (eg, a vanity page about a band, then the vanity pages about its members and albums) but have them all link to the same discussion? so we dont have to vote three (or more) times. Nateji77 11:33, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This guy has a less impressive resume than the average Wikipedian. --Fazdeconta 12:12, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I just added the other two articles to this vote. Votes above were cast in relation to only the first article (James Lockwood). My vote for all three is delete, vanity. --bainer 12:44, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- delete all three (or perhaps merge with Tory boy? :) ) Dunc|☺ 12:54, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all three. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:32, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete all. Gazpacho 20:19, 17 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.