This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational Drugs, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.
Complementary medicine Vs alternative medicine[edit]
This article shouldn't use the term "alternative", but "complementary" instead. There is no such thing as an alternative to medicine. There is no alternative to a vaccine, antibiotics, etc,... But there can be complements to a medicine, even if they are placebos, as long as they help a patient in any way.
All those articles about "alternative medicine" should start with a warning because they are misleading, based on nothing but pure belief, and therefore against what an encyclopedia is supposed to be: a source of knowledge. Romanoskov (talk) 15:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alternative medicine does have a specific meaning - please see Wikipedia:Alternative medicine for an explanation. We also tend to follow the wording used by reliable sources, so if all the sources said "complementary" then we would use "complementary". We also don't decide whether the reliable sources are using the wrong word - an encyclopaedia simply summarises current understanding. Xurizuri (talk) 22:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Literature on pseudoscience also commonly mention how alternative treatments can often also serve as a substitute for more effective medicine. Complementory (or integrative) are common slogans to sell it as something to be added on top of mainstream medicine, something that might somehow be more clueful about aspects that "allopathic" medicine apparently ignores, etc. It may well be what Weil attempts, but it would be an exception if it was really an evidence-based practice (and we'd need independent reliable medicine-quality sources that make these claims to promote that). Also, this is presented as if Weil was unique, but around the world many actual physicians have also promoted alternatives, or traditional practices, at the same time and there are clinics based on this principle. —PaleoNeonate – 23:15, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
