Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushicam

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:33, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sushicam[edit]

Tagged for speedy deletion, bringing it here because it gets 49,300 google hits [1], possibly not all on topic. Kappa 01:14, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Googling for "Sushicam Laitila" gets only 594 hits, Definitely vanity. Definitely delete Denni ☯ 02:07, 2005 May 25 (UTC)
Delete I'm the one who speedied it. Thought it was short on info then, and I still do now. Looks like vanity to me. Xcali 02:53, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 07:33, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a blog with only 594 google hits isn't worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Mgm|^(talk) 18:24, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

Especially with this lack of info on the subject (it could be speedied under criterion 1). Mgm|^(talk) 18:25, May 25, 2005 (UTC)

- Sushicam.com gets 5,810 hits. Kappa 23:42, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, speedy if possible; vanity. Tempshill 20:09, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Get rid of it. Linuxbeak | Desk 01:15, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.