Talk:Rizal (province)

WikiProject Philippine LGUs

Wondering how to edit the article? The WikiProject Philippine LGUs could be of help. :)

Moved "Rizal" Page

I moved this page from "Rizal" to "Rizal (Province)"; on the other hand, "Rizal" now redirects to the biography of the Philippine national hero José Rizal. This is because for most Filipinos (especially for students in all levels), "Rizal" refers to the person, not the province. --- Tito Pao 11:31, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Pasig City is still the capital

I've searched in vain for a law that designates Antipolo as capital of Rizal province, Sec. 52 of RA 7829, which converted Pasig City into an HUC still designates it as the provincial capital of Rizal. Not even RA 8508, which converted Antipolo into a city has designated it to be the provincial capital. --Scorpion prinz ^{(Talk | contribs)} 00:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Rizal Governor Casimiro A. Ynares III on June 17, 2008 announced the transfer of the Capitol from Pasig. It's P 270-million capitol building, being constructed in Antipolo City by Ortigas & Co., owner thereof, will be completed by December. Built on 5-hectare lot at the Ynares Center, it will employ 2,008 employees.gmanews.tv, Rizal capitol to be transferred to Antipolo--Florentino floro (talk) 11:45, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal rizal.png

Image:Ph seal rizal.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

— Save_Us_229 22:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

QC?

Was it a part of Rizal? --Howard the Duck 17:16, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

File:Ph seal rizal cainta.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ph seal rizal cainta.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ph seal taytay rizal.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ph seal taytay rizal.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ph seal rizal rodriguez.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ph seal rizal rodriguez.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ph seal rizal cardona.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ph seal rizal cardona.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ph seal rizal pililla.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ph seal rizal pililla.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Economy Section Deleted

I deleted the old section of the article called Economy. It had to link whatsoever to the economy of Rizal. It was a timeline of events that may have been copied from another website. It had no citations, and did not comply to Wikipedia's policy on neutrality.

If you wish to see it; here is the link to the edit before me: Economy of Rizal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asmark2 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

UPDATE I checked some old articles, and apparently, the article that is called Rizal used to have a better article on the economy. Someone trolled wikipedia by deleting to old old one and replacing it with something ridiculous. I shall be inputting the old article. The person who trolled was: 202.137.113.146. The date he edited was the 7th of December, 2012.

-Asmark2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asmark2 (talk • contribs) 03:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rizal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://www.yehey.com/news/Article.aspx?id=235667
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130429201612/http://nscb.gov.ph/poverty/defaultnew.asp to http://www.nscb.gov.ph/poverty/defaultnew.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposal move to "Rizal (province)" once again since 2006

Dear fellow Wikipedians,

I proposed that "Rizal" shall be moved back to "Rizal (province)". The name "Rizal" shall be redirected to Jose Rizal page. A Wikipedian moved this page to "Rizal (province) in 2006, making Rizal to be redirected to Jose Rizal. It is now been moved back to the original as of today.

I will support my decision, because is my decision to move this to the former. You will decide whether you support or oppose this proposal. If you vote "SUPPORT" or "OPPOSE" this proposed move, the votes will be counted.

Please understand this instructions.

Thank you. Rdp060707 (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Note:​ Your request is malformed, do you still want to continue this discussion? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

@HueMan1: No need to continue this for now. BTW, I did not know how I can open a discussion on proposed move before, but I know it as of today. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:30, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

@Rdp060707 @HueMan1: Rizal most commonly refers to the hero himself. Even in our college gen. ed. class, Rizal refers to the subject that is about him (Life and Works of Rizal). If Rizal alone is ambiguous it can be the title of the disambiguation page, but it never refers to the province as being the first impression of everyone's minds. Someone must start that requested moves now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Same case applies to Quezon which should be at Quezon (province), but here "Quezon" must be made as a disambiguation page as the province and the late president have both equal footing in primary topic hierarchy. I guess this should be discussed more thoroughly in WP:TAMBAYAN or in requested moves. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Removal of Pasig in the infobox

I have edited the infobox to remove reference to Pasig since RA 11475 officially designates Antipolo as the capital city and Pasig City has long been part of NCR.--Droomla (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 10 April 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved; no primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 17:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

---

Rizal → Rizal (province) – Rizal more commonly refers to José Rizal himself. "Rizal" should be made either as a redirect to his article or the title for the disambiguation page. The article on the province should be at "Rizal (province)". José Rizal is the first thing that comes to mind of many Filipinos when they encounter the word "Rizal" instead of the province that is named after him. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

• Support DAB at basename, no PRIMARY.Ortizesp (talk) 00:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

• Support Dab --00:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
• Support but move DAB here as José isn't a full match and there are other uses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.