Category talk:Socialists

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBiography Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSocialism Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Problematic[edit]

This category seems potentially highly problematic. Was Stalin a socialist? Is Tony Blair? Unless we are to be POV, and judge what a "real" Socialist is, I think we'd have to include both. Which would make the category so vague as to be practically useless. john k 21:37, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Not necessarily. Tony Blair would fit comfortably in a category "social democrats", while Stalin would fit in a category: "communist head of states". The category "socialists" should only be used for these people who do self-identify and/or ar seen as socialists, but which you can't fit into a more specific category. --Martin Wisse 22:00, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Communist or Socialist?[edit]

Should all those entries in the Communists category also be included in Socialists category? If not then Lenin should be removed. Communism is a form of Socialism, but if we include Communists in the Socialist category, then doesn't the Communist category become redundant? Iron Ghost 18:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]