Talk:IBM WebExplorer

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Version[edit]

What is the last version? Hobbes has 1.1h but the picture is from 1.2. -- Error 01:10, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Shortcomings[edit]

The shortcomings section is not a very useful/serious list. This is not a modern browser and it does not make sense to compare it to modern browsers. This browser was released in 1994, I had a quick look around and:

PNG was first released in 1995
In 1994 TLS was released as an experimental (and flawed in terms of security) feature of Netscape, not sure if it was even called HTTPS back then.
HTML frames were standardised in HTML 4.0 which came out in 1997
The first version of JavaScript was an experimental Netscape feature and came out in 1995.

--Anon 20:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

Will expand later this week...here are relavant links

Smallman12q (talk) 16:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toolkit[edit]

WebExWin seems to be the Toolkit to program on WebExplorer. --Error (talk) 01:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link is broken[edit]

link is broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.135.145.68 (talk) 09:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IBM WebExplorer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070222135131/http://www.seds.org/~spider/os2/webex.html to http://www.seds.org/~spider/os2/webex.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

@JJMC89: has complained that two non-free images are used at en:IBM WebExplorer. If that is a problem, one should go. From template:Non-free no reduce:

According to Wikipedia's policy for non-free content, the amount of non-free work should be as little as possible.

The non-free work in File:IBMExploreWikipedia20040224.png is the user interface elements such as window decoration. In File:OS2 IBM WebExplorer.png, the page is a product of the US government, which maybe is also free. Which should remain? --Error (talk) 01:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]