User talk:Yuechen z

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Yuechen z, Welcome to Wikipedia!
I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at Naming Conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.
Additional tips:
Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:
  • If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
  • If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
  • Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
  • You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
  • You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
  • If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Happy editing!

But why is 'Chinese' ambiguous? Either he's Chinese or he isn't; if he isn't, what is he? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:35, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No, that's simply not true. The term 'Chinese philosopher' means a philosopher who's Chinese; it has no other connotation. In any case, the rest of the article makes clear that he's not involved in any of the traditional schools of Chinese philosophy.
By the way, always sign your messages (as explained above); I'm simply assuming that the message I received came from you. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:46, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
It's disappointing that, instead of having the good manners to reply to me, you've simply deleted the nationality again. I've put a comment on the Talk page, and will try to get other users involved in the page to see what they say. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:58, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  1. Please sign your messages, as requested and explained above.
  2. 'Western' isn't a nationality; the analogy fails, and my point stands.
  3. If you don't know what his nationality is, why didn't you say so before? That's the (only good) reason for removing the reference to it.
  4. If you know where he studied and taught, why not add it to the article? Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:06, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

I don't understand why you refuse to follow simple Wikipedia etiquette and sign your messages, nor why you're adopting a chidish and confrontational tone. As for your final point, I do study and occasionally teach Chinese philosophy, which is why I'm making the point that I am. 'Western philosophy' is generally used to describe a style of philosophy, while 'English philosophy' and 'Chinese philosophy' describe philosophy from particular countries. It's sad that you think that 'Chinese philosophy' is so one-dimensional; others don't. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:31, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)