Talk:VIA C4

"One criticized more than one once VIA..." I'd edit this but I'm not sure what you're trying to say.. pomegranate 22:57, Aug 9, 2004 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was to merge with VIA C3 --Lox (t,c) 20:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The C4 was never released - it was a planned clone of the P4 that got cancelled, because the high clock speed methodology became discredited, due to thermal issues. VIA found small, cheap, low power, a more marketable proposition. Merge to VIA_C3 which alreayd covers this matter. Timharwoodx 10:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Voting[edit]

Support I support a Merge and redirect rather than a move --Lox (t,c) 21:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.